Sunday 19 March 2017

... and then they came for us

Martin Niemöller’s poem about political apathy during the rise of the Nazis has always struck a chord with me:
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me— and there was no one left to speak for me.
I’ve always tried to stick up for the basic rights of others even when I don’t agree with them as long as they are prepared to grant the same courtesy to others. In the past I’ve been involved in campaigning for things like gay marriage or for freedom of belief. I think someone has to do this because I really don’t like the way that Britain has been heading lately, with the rights of the young, the ill and disabled, those born overseas or from ethnic minorities being trampled on. At one time such views were regarded as publicly shameful with anyone treading even close to discriminatory ideas covering their tracks with phrases like “I’m not a racist but…” Now people will just say the most ill-informed and derogatory things about “the others” and wear it as a badge of pride. Who would have thought that “I’m not a racist but…” would have been the mark of a halcyon and enlightened age?

The “Brexit” Bill was passed at Westminster this week without any amendments. Quite what Theresa May’s government is planning is beyond anyone’s imagining – and seemingly they have no clue themselves. However, the amendments that were proposed were not unreasonable: a meaningful vote for parliament on any deal and guaranteeing the rights of EU nationals in the UK following the vote to leave. Both were kicked out indicating that our parliamentary democracy has been overridden in the first instance and that basic human rights have been abused in the second. The second amendment affects me directly.

I am constantly told that there is no way that EU citizens would be forced to leave the UK or that UK nationals in other EU countries would be forced to return. I actually believe the latter case but the former worries me. Expelling several million people based purely on their place of birth or perceived ethnicity would be on a par with the massive human rights abuses that lead to millions of civilians being displaced at the end of the Second World War. Surely this is unthinkable but we have been lied to like this so many times before and there are already numerous accounts of EU nationals who have applied for permanent residency (which they are currently entitled to anyway) being told that their application has been denied and that they should prepare to leave the country. This is wrong, not only on purely humanitarian grounds but also because it is against the law of this country. Then again, we have already seen the right-wing press trying to abuse the judiciary so we shouldn’t be too surprised by this.

I suppose my multi-ethnic, multi-national family must be utterly abhorrent to the kind of knuckle-dragging, under-educated, foul-mouthed bigots that seem to populate the lower reaches of the internet (for examples, check the typical comments section of the “newspaper of the year” Daily Mail). However, having lived together in Scotland for over 20 years we have received nothing other than a warm welcome from our neighbours and local community. If it is one thing that I think makes Scotland stand out compared to other parts of the country it is this idea that they define themselves in terms of those who want to make it their home – if you are happy enough to join the party then you are one of the party.

When the Scottish Independence Referendum was held in 2014 I was rather ambivalent about it. My primary concern was whether we would be able to stay unhindered and, as a result, our EU status was probably my primary concern. Before the vote, we were given an absolute guarantee that we would be welcome to stay even if the vote resulted in Scotland being expelled from the EU. However, the threat of leaving the EU probably weighed heavily on many people during that vote. When the Brexit vote came along I expected a similar guarantee to be given but nothing was forthcoming – possibly because Cameron was so cock-sure he was going to win. He should have given this reassurance as soon as the result was known but ran from the car-crash of his own making instead. May also refuses to do this: seemingly wanting to use displaced nationals as some kind of human shield – oddly enough, a tactic that Saddam Hussein used before the Gulf War.

Quite what May is planning is questionable. Whether she is planning the threat of expulsion like Joseph Stalin or Idi Amin to get what she wants is debatable but her behaviour is unlikely to win her any friends abroad. Carrying out such a move would undoubtedly land her in trouble with the UN although, as my wife pointed out, being told to go to Germany is on a par with trying to punish a child with a trip to Disneyland. Of course the difference is that one would hope that after the trip to Disneyland, one would be able to return home.

When the excrement hits the air conditioning unit like this it is interesting to see who will speak out for you. I’ve been appalled by the actions of the Conservative party and the Labour party (with a few notable exceptions) has been toothless. Tim Farron, of the Lib Dems, has done his best in Westminster but his party in Scotland has been anonymous. Locally, it has been the SNP and Green Party that have been willing to put up a fight and, notably, our constituency MSP has made a real effort to reassure us.

Just a few days after the Brexit result was known both my wife and mother-in-law received a parliamentary headed letter from our MSP acknowledging that we would be feeling anxious about the situation but offering the reassurance that he would be doing everything within his power to support us and inviting us to contact him if we had any concerns. I’m assuming that a similar letter was sent to all EU nationals and it was a genuine relief to my mother-in-law who is approaching 80 and would prefer not to have any more upheaval in her life having lived through persecution from both Nazi and Stalinist regimes, fled across the Iron Curtain to West Berlin and moved around Europe before finally settling in Scotland with us. The thing is, this was a simple, unprompted act from our elected representative that the government at Westminster should have done as a matter of urgency.

Earlier this week the First Minister proposed a new referendum on Scottish Independence. I have the feeling that this was not her preferred choice but that it is something that circumstances have pushed her into. Certainly, it was in her last manifesto stating the exact criteria that such a vote could be called. My personal preference would be that all UK citizens could be given a vote on the Brexit deal (which, I can tell you for free, will be appalling) but that appears to have been ruled out by dictator May. Scottish Independence would give us a get-out-of-jail free card on this and so I, for one, will be actively supporting it. I’m not a member of the SNP and don’t really intend to be but it is worth noting who is prepared to speak out when “they” came for us.

No comments:

Post a Comment